The Russian arms manufacturer Almaz-Antey says that the conclusions of the Dutch Safety Board (OVV) to not beat the sinking of the MH17. The CEO of the group said at a news conference in Moscow that the company experiments contradict the Board's conclusions.
The OVV present his findings this afternoon. The CEO of Almaz-Antey did not say what the conclusions of the research council. He said the findings of the weapons manufacturer have been passed to the council, but would it have done anything with it.
The arms manufacturer said that as the Boeing 777 Malaysia Airlines was shot down by a rocket-Buk, which then must type a date that is no longer used by the Russian army. The second conclusion is that the missile was launched from an area on July 17 by the arms manufacturer was controlled by Ukraine, namely Zarosjtsjenskoje.
Almaz-Antey include used a plane to simulate the explosion of a Buk missile. Because no Boeing 777 was available, a similar plane is used. Upon detonation conditions are simulated as on July 17, said the arms manufacturer. The experiment would therefore appear that the board is wrong.
The company claims to have the tests done because the sanctions have been imposed after the sinking of the MH17. Who calls Almaz-Antey illegal. According to correspondent David Jan Godfroid need independent experts elaborate on the technical aspects of the presented Russian experiments to see how valid they are. "It especially seems that the Russians want to create doubt about the Dutch findings," said Godfroid.
KievFrom the Ukrainian capital Kiev sources report that the Research Council concludes that it is a Buk missile that is fired from the region of Snizjnoje. The blast would have been to the left of the cab. Therefore, the pilots were slain and broke the nose of the aircraft.
In the body of one of the two pilots 200 are fragments of a Buk-missile found. In the body of the other pilot 120. The fragments would indicate the new type Buk m1-2.
http://nos.nl/nieuws/© AFP
Reactie plaatsen
Reacties